Stone Carving Processes
 

The processes involved in making the sculptures vary, depending the hardness of the stone and the degree to which its constituent elements adhere or lock into each other.  Softer stones permit sharper chisels.  Harder ones are tougher than the steel of the chisel. 

Soapstone is mostly talc, hydrous magnesium silicate.  It is very soft (one on Mohs scale of hardness) and easy to work.  It responds quickly to the chisel and hammer, can be refined with rasps and files and wet-sands well with little effort.

Alabaster is mostly gypsum, calcium sulfate, two on Mohs scale.  It is basically a salt deposit from a shallow evaporative basin.  It dissolves slowly in water, so it is unsuitable for outdoor display.  Use of the chisel on alabaster is not a good idea, as the rock fractures easily and bruises deeply under the blows of the chisel.  The basic shape is achieved with saws, grinders and drills.  Riffler rasps are used to refine the shape.  The beauty of the stone is revealed as it is wet-sanded and then polished.  Alabaster is, in some cases, quite translucent.

Limestone, three on Mohs scale, is mainly calcium carbonate from the detritus of sea life, deposited on sea beds.  It can be chiseled and ground.  I generally approach it first with a diamond, hardness 10, saw.  I cut parallel lines into the surface at a depth equal to the space between the lines.  I then use an air hammer to knock out the material between the saw cuts.  I keep going in this way until close to the desired shape, at which point I begin cross hatching shallow saw cuts without using the hammer.  I then proceed with grinders and sometimes riffler files.  I use rifflers on Indiana limestone more often than on the Columbus, or Kelleys Island, limestone because the small fossil elements that make up that stone are cemented together less well.  The rifflers become dull much more quickly on the Kelleys Island stone.  One could think of the Indiana stone as being softer, although its elements are equally hard.  Water passes through it more quickly.  The refining of the surface is done with abrasive bricks, pieces of silicon carbide hones or grinding wheels.  I begin with coarse bricks and continue with finer and finer ones as the surface becomes smoother.  The polishing process continues with paper in ascending grits, up to 2000 grit from 40.  All of this refining and finishing takes place with water running across the surface to lubricate the cutting action of the abrasives and to wash away the “dust”.  Paradoxically, the entire polishing process involves putting ever more numerous, smaller and smaller cuts into the stone. The surface is then closed over by final buffing and polishing.  I seal the limestone with silicones and wax.

Marble, finds its origin in limestone but is metamorphosed through heat, pressure and time to become a material that is more or less crystalline.  The spaces in between the particles in limestone are filled up by crystal growth in marble.  Water does not pass through it.  As it is made of the same stuff as limestone, it also three on the hardness scale.   But is much more difficult to work.  I often have to sharpen my diamond saws on sandstone because the blades glaze over when they are being used on the marble.  The quartz particles in the sandstone are hard enough to free the cutting faces of the diamonds from their metal matrix.  I use the same techniques to carve the marble as I do on the limestone although I often use small diamond files.  The Vermont marble crystals are sugary; Georgian marble has much larger crystals, like rock salt.  The Vermont marble is easier to carve.  The crystals in Georgian marble permit the eye to enter the stone.

The erratics that I carve are granitic and have often undergone some metamorphism.  Gneisses mix in with more homogenous areas of crystal growth.  Stone from earlier eras is swallowed up or engulfed by subsequent magma movement.  One part of the stone sometimes forms way before another…  Generally the stones come from the basement rocks of the Laurentian Mountains.  They formed deep beneath the surface, then, as the overlying stone was eroded away and the weight of the crust became lighter, the basement levels were exposed to the surface.  The glaciers then delivered them up to me.  The time and the journey have an effect on the surfaces, which are slightly different chemically, often, from the interior of the stones.  Generally the stones are made up of feldspar, hardness 6, and quartz, hardness 7.  The darker stones have more metal in them and have come from deeper beneath the surface than the lighter stones.  As the stones are harder than steel, which has a hardness of 5.5, steel tools simply crush against the surface.  Tungsten carbide tips work on stone but would fracture if they were overly sharp.  For years I used a bushing head (it looks a little like a meat tenderizer) on an air hammer to work down the surfaces of the stones.  The surface crystals would eventually fracture and fall away under the repeated blows of the hammer against the bushing head.  Over the last couple of decades the cost of industrial diamonds has gone down far enough that most of the heavy lifting in material removal from the stone is accomplished now with the diamond blades.  I use the same parallel cut process I described when discussing the limestone.  As the material is so much harder, the finishing process takes much, much longer.  I think its worth it, however, to use the harder stones because of the history they have had, which can be read in them, and because of their inherently lasting qualities.


Stones


As I walk the beach near my studio and look down at the stones I’ve crossed time and again over my life. I find in them what I am prepared to find. As my preparation has improved through education and experience, what the beach offers becomes richer. I see in the stones before me and under me, and in those I take from the beach to carve, the manifestation of history, geology, process and time. At the same time I associate with the shapes, colors, patterns and relationships I see my own history and involvement with art making, my experience of life and the world around me. Each walk is different. I am unprepared for the unexpected, the surprising, for the minor epiphanies that this meditative process offers. These are the rewards of the walk.

In my work I begin with what I know, and then enter into it to discover what I do not know, could not have imagined without the experience gained in the engagement.

In one group of paintings I focus on the beach. I imagine I am painting, as I paint, as the rocks forming, as the weather and the water giving shape to them and revealing the pattern and the color of their early history. I make marks that are analogous to what I see in the stones. The marks are modified by what I know, or think I know, about the geological processes involved in their genesis. Sometimes I consider the marks in the light of art history and choose modes of representation or painting language that seem to fit the individual stones. My mood is often determined by weather and sometimes by season. I am depressed by the dark days and energized by the days of bright sunshine. The quality of the light in the paintings is related to that nexus.

My photographs document and celebrate what I have selected to focus on: Kelleys Island, the stones, the water, the land, the vegetation, and the effects of weather and ice. Through this concentration I attempt to define my sense of place and belonging, our time within the context of geological time.
 

The sculpture is meant to be evocative, to suggest relationships between the stones and aspects of nature and life that are dear to us. So they are metaphorical. At the same time the stones have their own life and own time. They are tangible and not referential. They insist on being stones. In man’s short history, human beings have lived with and connected with stones long enough that some of our response to it has become innate. We are connected with and respond deeply to stone even though we are surrounded by plastic in an atmosphere suffused with the electronic cacophony of information dissemination. Stone vessels suggest containment, protection, sheltering, food preparation, serving and storage. But are they really vessels or are they like vessels? And what does that mean? 

As I have taught sculpture for over thirty-five years, I have often worked on my own stuff in front of other people. There is a question that is often asked innocently enough but which is always fairly annoying: “What’s it supposed to be?” The implication is that what it is has not been adequately rendered or that what I’m working on is so botched as to be indecipherable. So I give some half-baked remark like, “It’s a rock.” If what is being made looks like a vessel, the annoying question is never posed. 

I have studied the human figure for over forty years, modeling from life in clay and in wax. A formal vocabulary becomes ingrained and finds its way to the surface in many of the stone pieces. There is the juxtapositoning of a stone (in the case of the erratics, billions of years old) to the soft swelling of life. So the ephemeral is made lasting through its conjunction with the ancient material. 

The stones are meant to offer rewards to the hand that touches them. My hands work them until they feel good to me, so they can feel good for others. What feels good is based on our biology, the way we move our muscles, what we respond to with our hands in our daily life and in our most precious moments. The strong connection between our brains and our hands reinforces the ties of sensation to memory and thought. 

The stones all deal with a passage through time and allude to the movements of life, decision, indecision, rest, and action. 

Finished piece in the gallery

 

 

Home Search SiteContact Info