![]() |
Stone
Carving Processes
|
Soapstone is mostly talc, hydrous magnesium silicate. It is very soft (one on Mohs scale of hardness) and easy to work. It responds quickly to the chisel and hammer, can be refined with rasps and files and wet-sands well with little effort. Alabaster is mostly gypsum, calcium sulfate, two on Mohs scale. It is basically a salt deposit from a shallow evaporative basin. It dissolves slowly in water, so it is unsuitable for outdoor display. Use of the chisel on alabaster is not a good idea, as the rock fractures easily and bruises deeply under the blows of the chisel. The basic shape is achieved with saws, grinders and drills. Riffler rasps are used to refine the shape. The beauty of the stone is revealed as it is wet-sanded and then polished. Alabaster is, in some cases, quite translucent.
The
erratics that I carve are granitic and have often undergone some
metamorphism. Gneisses mix in with more homogenous areas of crystal growth.
Stone from earlier eras is swallowed up or engulfed by subsequent
magma movement. One part of
the stone sometimes forms way before another…
Generally the stones come from the basement rocks of the
Laurentian Mountains. They
formed deep beneath the surface, then, as the overlying stone was eroded
away and the weight of the crust became lighter, the basement levels
were exposed to the surface. The
glaciers then delivered them up to me. The
time and the journey have an effect on the surfaces, which are slightly
different chemically, often, from the interior of the stones.
Generally the stones are made up of feldspar, hardness 6, and
quartz, hardness 7. The
darker stones have more metal in them and have come from deeper beneath
the surface than the lighter stones.
As the stones are harder than
steel, which has a hardness of 5.5, steel tools simply crush against the
surface. Tungsten carbide
tips work on stone but would fracture if they were overly sharp.
For years I used a bushing head (it looks a little like a meat
tenderizer) on an air hammer to work down the surfaces of the stones.
The surface crystals would eventually fracture and fall away under
the repeated blows of the hammer against the bushing head.
Over the last couple of decades the cost of industrial diamonds has
gone down far enough that most of the heavy lifting in material removal
from the stone is accomplished now with the diamond blades.
I use the same parallel cut process I described when discussing the
limestone. Stones As I walk the beach near my studio and look down at the stones I’ve crossed time and again over my life. I find in them what I am prepared to find. As my preparation has improved through education and experience, what the beach offers becomes richer. I see in the stones before me and under me, and in those I take from the beach to carve, the manifestation of history, geology, process and time. At the same time I associate with the shapes, colors, patterns and relationships I see my own history and involvement with art making, my experience of life and the world around me. Each walk is different. I am unprepared for the unexpected, the surprising, for the minor epiphanies that this meditative process offers. These are the rewards of the walk.
In one group of paintings I focus on the beach. I imagine I am painting, as I paint, as the rocks forming, as the weather and the water giving shape to them and revealing the pattern and the color of their early history. I make marks that are analogous to what I see in the stones. The marks are modified by what I know, or think I know, about the geological processes involved in their genesis. Sometimes I consider the marks in the light of art history and choose modes of representation or painting language that seem to fit the individual stones. My mood is often determined by weather and sometimes by season. I am depressed by the dark days and energized by the days of bright sunshine. The quality of the light in the paintings is related to that nexus. My photographs document and celebrate what I have selected to focus on: Kelleys Island, the stones, the water, the land, the vegetation, and the effects of weather and ice. Through this concentration I attempt to define my sense of place and belonging, our time within the context of geological time. |
|
As I have taught sculpture for over thirty-five years, I have often worked on my own stuff in front of other people. There is a question that is often asked innocently enough but which is always fairly annoying: “What’s it supposed to be?” The implication is that what it is has not been adequately rendered or that what I’m working on is so botched as to be indecipherable. So I give some half-baked remark like, “It’s a rock.” If what is being made looks like a vessel, the annoying question is never posed.
The stones are meant to offer rewards to the hand that touches them. My hands work them until they feel good to me, so they can feel good for others. What feels good is based on our biology, the way we move our muscles, what we respond to with our hands in our daily life and in our most precious moments. The strong connection between our brains and our hands reinforces the ties of sensation to memory and thought. The stones all deal with a passage through time and allude to the movements of life, decision, indecision, rest, and action. Finished piece in the gallery
|